Can the identity of an interviewee be revealed if the facility appeals a cited deficiency?

The identity of an interviewee can be revealed if the facility appeals a cited deficiency, particularly when the deficiency is directly tied to the information provided during the interview. In this context, the rationale is that when the appeal process occurs, the specifics of the deficiency, including the evidence or information gathered from interviews, become part of the review process. If the cited deficiency was substantiated by the interviewee's statements, revealing the identity can help the facility address the concerns raised and clarify matters during the appeal.

Additionally, maintaining confidentiality is crucial; however, in circumstances where the integrity of the appeal is at stake, such as when the deficiency hinges on the interview details, the balance between confidentiality and transparency may shift. The regulatory framework often allows for this clarification to ensure that due process is upheld and that the facility has a fair opportunity to contest the cited deficiency.